In 2009 Cisco conducted a scale survey among 2000 employees and found out that 70% of them show higher productivity when working remotely. Over the past seven years, constant development of online communication tools have made remote teams even more efficient. The London Global Leaders’ Summit forecasts that in 2020, half of the office employees will work in distributed teams. In our long-standing affection for remote work, we can’t help loving this tendency. There are, however, threats along the way which can make a distributed team work less efficiently. If your aims are high, better avoid these five mishaps.
Don’t neglect diversity
The potentially different cultural backgrounds of your team can be leveraged in many ways. Apart from adding a few extra national holidays to your calendar, you can consider boosting your team’s innovative thinking with cross cultural training sessions. The only thing you shouldn’t do with cultural diversity, is disregard it!
A lesson we’ve learned the hard way is that companies frequently treat distributed teams as an appendix to their main line-up. Cultural and language peculiarities are considered irrelevant. After all, does it really matter when the team is not physically present in the office anyway?
Make sure your distributed employees feel valued.
Don’t let the distance and absence of eye-contact bowl you over. Make sure your distributed employees feel appreciated, valued and acknowledged. Just like you would with a local team. Their differences will become advantages.
Don’t make communication difficult
In a previous article we paid tribute to communication platforms and their tremendous importance for the efficiency of a remote team. Communication channels become lifelines, connecting them with their peers—with the rest of the team. By skimping out and not setting up a robust communication flow, you risk running the team at a bare minimum level. Team connectivity will suffer, concentration will become harder to achieve due to the disconnection, and in the end, motivation is likely to dwindle.
At Beetroot, we believe it’s better to over-communicate rather than buttoning up your team’s mouth. Yet, cluttering up a desktop with communication tools won’t make things any better. Your communication strategy should be lean and clean, allowing everyone to stay updated, but not overwhelmed by new-message-notifications. Our golden rule is to choose up to three communication platforms—for instance, e-mail, Slack and Jira—and stick to them, to edge out a smooth information flow.
Don’t save efforts when hiring
Hiring people for a remote team is not as black and white as it’s painted. In reality, constructing an in-house and a distributed team are quite similar. Building a meaningful distance relationship, however, is obviously more difficult (but that’s for another day).
During your search for a unicorn, don’t ever forget the two words “consistency” and “rigor”. Even if you need new team members at the drop of a hat, don’t rush the hiring process. One of our more exceptional cases involved 100 qualified candidates, whom we presented to a client before they opted to go ahead with one of them. This is not to say that a hiring process should be long, but if you need time to build a successful team, don’t hesitate to take it. Long searches certainly do put a break on your business, but they generally pay off in the long run.
Don’t conceal information
How do you make sure that all team members, scattered around the world, feel involved and treated fairly—two important components of employee happiness?
Be transperent, clear and honest when communicating.
It’s a challenging task, and what we’ve learned is that transparency gets you far. Your distributed team should be aware of everything that is going on in the company, just like your in-house team. They need more than a list of current tasks. They need to understand your long-term strategies, your vision and plans. Be transparent, clear and honest when communicating. This will create the necessary conditions for a long-term relationship built on trust.
Don’t underestimate in-person meetings
There’s not a single paper on communication that doesn’t mention in-person meetings. And we want to drive the nail even further into the wall. The investment of a flight ticket and a couple of nights at a hotel every once a while pays off. Speaking from his experience in previous positions, one of my colleagues told me, “The times we couldn’t or wouldn’t travel were also the times that our business became fragmented and unfocused. In the end, it became a vicious cycle where the mere idea of meeting up with increasingly distant colleagues felt heavy. If these relationships aren’t constantly massaged, it becomes painful to put them back on track.”
While remote work indisputably comes with many advantages, face-to-face communication and meetings in-person are incredibly meaningful for a productive cooperation. By getting to know each other better, you promote the formation of a global community and, of course, trust and awareness.
Personal meetings may also be more efficient for solving complicated technical issues. We’ve encountered situations when serious bugs were much easier to fix via face-to-face work, rather than through endless Skype calls.
There’s a universal leitmotif for remote team management. The majority of mistakes in leading a remote team occur because managers perceive their teams as a short-term project over permanent reinforcement to their capabilities—one that grow over time. To make them function effectively, regard them as a long-term investment—hopefully, just like your business in general.